Also the potential is not correct...
If you do it quark like 2/3 2/3 -1/3 you will get 2*(2/9) - 4/9 = 0!
because 2/3 are repulsive...
You should always write down all details of what you exactly name how
and what e.g. potential means.
The Dirac equation is plain nonsense as the e/p magnetic moment field
(the strongest of all) is missing. Also the 3 rotation solution is
unphysical for mass...
So going on with old garbage just produces a new flavor of old garbage...
J.W.
On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a sphere, we
build it up as an addition of such paths.
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 8:00 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote:
Stefan
There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points
on a
sphere except for one axes angular motion (w instead of v)
J.W.
On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the
> connection between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects
> experiment... How come we can define a normal 2000 century model
and
> end up with no determinism and whatnot strangities.
>
>
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14G9U_Iee4jsppn0Rcp4A5BBrGDRkR5tC/view?usp=drivesdk
>
> I will blog in easier to understand format later. But really
it's not
> a difficult stude, which is a good thing in my mind.
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
