Compare this with Hans Coler's devices (1940s) http://www.rexresearch.com/coler/colerb.htm
Also, the much older, Daniel McFarland Cook device of 1871 https://patents.google.com/patent/US119825A/en FF On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:54:36 -0400 Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Corrected > > http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 1:46 PM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > JL Naudin never found an OU device he didn't like. He did tons on the MEG > > > > Https://www.jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm > > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 1:07 PM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Reminds me of Tom Bearden's MEG, motionless electromagnetic generator. > >> > >> As a EE since 1977, my experience has shown "OU" on these devices are > >> not measuring the area under the VxI waveform that is non-sinusoidal > >> properly and have shown these flaws with a digital oscilloscope and a > >> sampling resistor more than once. > >> > >> It does not please the "inventor". > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 12:40 PM Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Can this be real? One of those ‘hiding in plain sight” rarities? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I see good journal articles and claims of replications and yet………… (cue > >>> crickets sound) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *From:* Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> > >>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 06, 2023 12:27 PM > >>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Osamu Ide > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> A patent app on an OU transformer: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> US20130009625A1 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 12:06 PM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Here's his original article from the Journal of Applied Physics > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Https://www.rexresearch.com/ide/jap77.pdf > >>> <https://www.rexresearch.com/ide/jap77.pdf> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 11:50 AM Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Does anybody know what the deal is with this guy? He claims overunity > >>> and there appears to be some replication. He’s been published in some > >>> really good journals across years. What’s the story? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *CAUTION:* This message was sent from outside the Nexstar organization. > >>> Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the > >>> sender. > >>> > >> -- Frogfall <frogf...@nucleon.co.uk>
