i'd have to look at that very carefully in light of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbr0fQfJC-8
He cites some compelling reasons it might be busted, but, you never know. On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 03:12, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's Back...LK-99 second chance? Silicon? > > > https://www.tomshardware.com/news/lk-99-patent-update-suggest-it-could-work > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:25 AM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And a new candidate with "dancing" Cooper pairs. >> >> >> https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-identify-a-strange-new-form-of-superconductivity >> >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 8:31 PM Jonathan Berry < >> jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end >>> down. >>> >>> This suggests one of 2 things, they either made a ferromagnetic material >>> not a superconductor. >>> >>> OR, they made a superconductor that is only superconductive at one end. >>> >>> So a tiny bit of contamination only occurred at that point? >>> >>> Maybe the thin film technique works better because it increases chances >>> for contamination? >>> >>> On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 08:58, Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:13:33 -0400: >>>> Hi, >>>> [snip] >>>> >Two down >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/ >>>> >>>> ...maybe the impurities are what it's all about. Clearly the substance >>>> they produced behaved remarkably like a >>>> superconductor. Perhaps it just needs a bit more study to determine >>>> what the real superconductor is? >>>> Buy electric cars and recharge them from solar panels on your roof. >>>> >>>>
