BTW, just curious about things with a high dielectric constant as these have been correlated with both Free Energy (a researcher with a coil around a Barium Titanate coil inputting a special frequency got a blue glow and free energy out, yes, Barium again pops up).
But also I recall reading about highly dielectric sands and powders being found to have some reduced rate of fall in a vacuum or did they demonstrate a degree of antigravity, I forget. Perhaps both. Maybe it was even a connection to T.T Brown's work, but at any rate the interesting thing is that Barium Titanate which has a dielectric constant of 1200! Just so happens to be microscopically form a double terminated pyramid trapped inside a cube. Now I have a REALLY REALLY high degree of surface level conviction/hunch that this high dielectric constant is actually in part an aetheric property! That it has made denser aetheric energy within itself. That those structures if made macroscopically and nested would create some degree of increase in the dielectric constant of the whole even if made of materials that have a value nearer 1, Though perhaps the other features might be needed such as the atomic numbers, I have found that certain numbers manifest a lot of aetheric energy when surrounded by a number of "edged" that relate to that number in some way. Jonathan On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 12:45, Jonathan Berry <jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have presented this to some degree here years ago but time for another > crack at it. > When I was in bed this morning I thought of this list, actually in that > state I was able to think, I believe of a few extra cases that currently I > can't put my finger on, they would belong in the middle of the list. > > Anyway if we were to ask if there is the possibility of some type of > phenomena in space that might be induced to move, there is a LOT of "stuff" > in space that conventional science recognizes. > From frame dragging, Dirac space, Virtual particles/Quantum field theory, > relic neutrino flux, Dark matter/Energy and much more: > https://vimeo.com/22956103 > Indeed the Lamb shift is a separation of virtual particles by an electric > field that causes the orbital of the Hydrogen atom to split into two very > close levels. > > The first is the ARV (Alien Reproduction Vehicle) known as the fluxliner > and a very compelling case is made for it in this humorous and effective > video: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUFYnVXbLoY > > There you will see that MANY people claimed to see this same hovering > saucer at an Air-Show for top brass only. > > The startling thing about the design is that the craft had an array of 48 > high voltage capacitors that looks like a maximized version of the next > one, this very own lists "Capwarp"! > http://amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html > > There we see a number of people managed to successfully replicate this > thing, and I recall a number of additional people on this list claiming > some success that wasn't recorded there. > > So, given the Lamb shift and other information letting us know there is > something to be affected (including by an electric field) and the multiple > witnesses to the ARV and multiple claimants we could come to the conclusion > that there is a VERY HIGH probability that a circular array of HV > capacitors can create levitation. > > We also of course have the work of Thomas Townsend Brown, now some of his > capacitor arrays were indeed very similar to this, though his thrusts were > stronger he had large numbers of layers submerged in oil and both a weight > loss and thrust was noticed, this is in addition to the more showy but > arguably potentially more ion wind based examples he later worked on. > > But there is a book, I think it might be the Yellow cover of "Antigravity > and the World Grid" where it mentions a rumor that T.T Brown was rumored to > have got far higher levels of Antigravity from a circular array of > capacitors. > > But we aren't done yet! > > In an "Infolio" I got from Rex Research it mentioned a high school kid who > made a large circular capacitor with a Polystyrene dielectric, it lost > weight no when charged no matter which polarity was up, this aligns with > T-T Brown claiming that there was both an antigravity AND a propulsive > component to his work. > > Then one day I found a comment on Youtube, it was about a University > student (Doyle a few years on?) who got levitation from a glass dielectric > based circular capacitor! > > When I relayed this to (RIP) Marc McCandlish he told me about another man > who made a very very large circular capacitor and he used a black > dielectric similar to what is used for shoes, and energized it with a Tesla > coil, if his claims are genuine he made a craft he flew in! > > Ok so we have some other interesting evidence to consider. > There is a claim of another science fair experiment at a school, whis one > involved 2 circular plates of Aluminium with a time varying (IIRC) HV field > applied, a ball bearing placed on this began to moe in a circle, given that > there is no obvious electromagnetic mechanism for such a behavior and we > are looking for evidence of some type of "Aerther Vortex" involved with > large HV appropriately designed capacitors then this also supports the the > picture being painted here. > > In addition, I also at one point (wish I had kept track of it) multiple > claims of circular (might have been spheres actually) charged with high > voltage DC in association with a second pole, and a torque being noticed on > the components, essentially another case supporting a circular force from > HV capacitors that seems not to be easily explained by electrodynamic > forces. > > Then there is the Ducret house account mentioned in the Ether Technology > book by Rho Sigma, it was dielectric disk which under the influence of high > voltage rotated then becoming airborne, in this case I believe the rotation > was easily explained by electrostatic motor effects but the levitation > while not a perfect match seems to be potentially relevant. > > There was also a man, who's name eludes me at present but the account is > not unknown, he had a device he demonstrated at the World's fair, he > described it as a "Rotary Condenser" and and weight loss was demonstrated, > though there is no image of the device, but the name certainly leads to > plausibility that it is perhaps related. > > The next is Alexey Chekurkov, while his device has more going on than just > a circular HV capacitor, it DOES satisfy that requirement and produces > levitation! It also has a mix of DC and AC high voltages (Hutchison > Effect0 and magnets and counter-rotation but that makes sense of his > effects being relatively effective with a poorer electrical capacity than > say the ARV or Cap Warp. > Interestingly I have now found that Alexey is selling kits and I would be > curious as to the cost if they are still available. > Also while looking for his channel I see a Retro Reflector capacitor > design that is a perfect copy for something I have been working on, I have > yet to watch his videos about it but here are two: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CK-XxlMw3fA and > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rF-vwk5K3s > > Ok, so what of my own research? > Well, I saw a correlation that actually others also saw, it might be > obvious if you look at this graphic: https://ibb.co/BVmNxFm > That list isn't exhaustive, for instance just today I was marvelling over > the similarity of the Leedskalnin rotor which has 24 Horseshoe magnets with > poles facing out, which one attempted replicator noticed to create a visual > disturbance. > And this is most interesting as there is a researcher by the name Ferlini, > he put 4 Horseshoe magnets with poles in, he tuned the spacing to balance > out the two paths the fux could take, either shorting between the poles of > each the other end of each horseshoe or going to the neighboring horse > shoe. When he did this over time the table became fuzzy as a visual > disturbance was created, and then eventually a myst was created, you know > what else this reminds me of??? > > The Stan Deyo claim of a researcher to made an antigravity device known as > the wedding cake, it includes both of these elements, visual disturbed > space and split rings of magnetic materials! > > Has anyone else put those 3 claims together? Does anyone else even know > of those 3 claims? > Ok, so why am I saying this is my research??? > Well you see I have been able to feel this "aether vortex energy" quite > keenly since 2012 when I made a coil that charged my hand, and I have had > many feel the energy from my designs including when they were hidden and > the people knew nothing of my work. > > The point is that one thing I have discovered is that you need 2 things, > you need to encourage rotation of energies but ALSO you need to create some > resistance or turbulence in the flow. > Imagine having your cars wheels off the ground and you get it going, the > wheels are spinning but they are cold, no heat, or maybe they aren't > spinning and you have the brakes on hard, again, nothing. > But if you apply the gas and brakes either to the right level or > alternately then the wheels rotate AND heat is generated as the disc brakes > experience friction. > > This is an apt analogy for what I have found occurs with designs that make > an aether vortex, though the majority of my work has been unpowered and no > magnets or HV used. I have seen this numerous times. > Sometimes a design won't be strong but I will add something that produces > resistance, it will be intense and then drop to a low energy as the > resistance was too high. > Or there will be "energy" in motion and it will get faster and faster and > faster and it becomes less and less substantial till I can't feel it > anymore! > > Consider the difference between a river with laminar flow you wouldn't > even know was flowing, .vs one with rocks that makes white water, or indeed > I have a shower head with ceramic balls and this induced turbulence makes > the water feel a lot harder and more solid! > > Well, my research also concludes that the electric type energies in the > aether have a spin, and the positive and negative energies tend to move in > opposite directions and as such they collide making heat, this stops motion. > But the separation with an electric field allows these energies to pass > without collision, but perhaps the best is some balance between the two > effects, either a dynamic balance or a static one. > > We might also look at the Hamel device which has a few claims of partial > and full successful reproduction, one guy with partial success I actually > visited! > His rings became charged electrostatically, but if there is any circular > motion in that space the magnetic field would create a vertical electric > force separating positive and negative charges! > > So because the effect isn't direct, a circular HV capacitor doesn't ensure > an aether vortex, it makes it likely and if it happens antigravity might > result. > But it is important to realize why negative results don't "Debunk" > something including the obvious fact that a negative result can be either > incompetent or sometimes IT is the lie! > > Consider that Marc McCandlish the artist who drew the thing and promoted > it, and the man who made the documentary have both died mysteriously. > Stefan Marinov, who claimed a rotating field created by magnetic means > (Magnetic Vortex Hyper-Ionization Device (MAGVID) suddenly committed > suiscide mysteriously, there is no shortage of such mysterious deaths and > suicides. > The point is that if "they" have a history of killing, threatening and > buying people off we would be foolish to assume they aren't going to have a > few accounts that say "I tried this and it failed". > > So between the suppression efforts (albeit inconsistent) and the > complexities of an effect that isn't directly electromagnetic and involves > new physics that is hardly understood by convention at all... > It shouldn't surprise that sometimes things fail, there are many cases of > competent scientists failing to replicate something that is now well > established as real. > > So be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water! > > Consider also the Joe Cell, it is lifeless until it is given a charge by a > battery, sure it's not high voltage but it is a capacitor of sorts with > water as the dielectric (ideally nothing to make it conductive is used) and > Antigravity has been claimed from the Joe Cell. And many have claimed some > degree of success with it that can't be explained as conventional > electrolysis, including a friend. > > Ok, let's consider LENR, Bob Greenyer of the Martin Fleischmann Memorial > Project has a LOT of photographic evidence for a Toroidal form that gets > created and imprinted on metal from Cold Fusion, Ken Shoulders charge > Cluster (EVO, Exotic vacuum Objects) Hutchison Effect samples, and many > many more places, this structure is very similar to the coil I first made > that I felt emit an energy, it is a coil made of a coil, Russians who made > a coil of a coil of a coil (maybe another level?) input power and had a > signal come out for days after it was disconnected, shades of Stevem Mark's > TPU which fits perfectly with what I have been talking about with respect > to balancing acceleration and resistance, his devices could go into a > meltdown mode. > > So what do we have here? > A stunning number of coincidences and liars? > > Or something real? > > Does it cost anything (except possibly your life if you make too > extraordinary claims and your standing/respect by those who would have also > scoffed at the Write Brother's before their flight...). > No, this research can be done safely and with no expense, truly I have > developed very postent unpowered designs can be can made with no cost > (because yes, EM/Light affects the aether so even images will do as Dan A. > Davidson also claimed) or just bits of any garden/craft or electrical wire > that is easy to bend, a majority (but far from everyone) of people can feel > this phenomena. > Admittedly the odds are lower among skeptical types which seems to include > scientists and yet there are absolute skeptics who have felt the energy. > > There are people who have felt energy from designs that were hidden they > knew nothing of. > > This research that can be instrumental in humanity surviving and thriving > is easily accessible but I think that there are concerted efforts to > suppress such and perhaps even at the Psychic level. > See this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9hwXoCrEUs > > And I think after watching that you could conclude that there are > influences opposed to humanity delving into this technology. > > Of course if we switch the electric to magnetic we can also consider > Podkletnov, John Schnurer (previously on this list) and Ning Li all making > claims about gravity reduction from a rotating field under a superconductor. > > The point is that there are threads whough this technology and sometimes > it might be explain away as researcher B knowing about researcher A's > claims, but other times it seems that they are truly independent, no one > would assume that the Stan Deyo Wedding Cake design, the Ferlini design and > the Leedskalnin design would have been known likely known to each other or > have taken any part in their efforts/claims even if perhaps Ferlini might > have known of Leedskalnin's work for instance, the visual disturbance angle > was only mentioned more recently by an experimenter who tried to replicate > Leedskalnin's work, and he wouldn't have known of Ferlini as Ferlini is NOT > well known. > > Interestingly the vanishing paper clip report where a kid energized a > steel loop antenna with a paperclip hanging in the center that someone left > on the Bill Beaty's site for reporting anomalies potentially fits as it has > a circular magnetic circuit with a break and a visual disturbance > (invisibility), BTW I have a fiend who is in contact with kid/man who did > this experiment. > > And it is interesting is it not that magnetic materials, iron which has a > huge value for it's magnetic permeability when cut open can release an > "aetheric energy" that affects the index of reflection? > Does that not make a little too much sense to ignore?! > > If the properties of the iron were being displaced into space, you could > see it as the "ghost" of the iron atoms being pushed out of the > iron/magnetic circuit much like Dr Strange is pushed out of his body, just > as many NDE/OBE's have people out of their body. > > Why should ghosts just be for people? > My argument is that there is stuff in space that becomes disturbed by and > has a memetic property for the matter and the energy that disturbs it. > We can also look at how Homeopathic tinctures are made, they dilute yes, > but then they apply 'succession" which means whacking the bottle against a > firm surface that is just soft enough not to break the bottle. > > The same effect has been seen in some tests of Inertial propulsion and > other situations where mass has been suddenly stopped, SOMETHiNG has been > propelled out of the matter as it hasn't stopped as willingly as matter. > Indeed I asked a specific claimant who had made an inertial propulsion > device that for argument's sake is similar to the Dean Drive and indeed > they confirmed that people had noticed just such a phenomena. > > Even Einstein believed there was an Aether (just one one responsible for > the reference frame of light speed) and General Relativity requires it. > Actually the inflationary universe theory has moving space also. > Even though conventional science acknowledges the existence of many > "aethers" by various different names (seldom using that word) it is worth > noting that no one, not Einstein or anyone since has an explanation for how > the one way speed of light can be C in all frames of motion! > > It is merely argued that the one way speed of light can't me measured, and > yet if we assume that Lorentz aEther Theory (LET) is correct then we get > the same essential predictions that Special Relativity (SR) makes, only we > don't have to accept ANY of the contradictions and paradoxes. Light > doesn't magically travel at C relative to all observers in all inertial > frames (unless they drag their frame with them, and then only the light in > the area they drag) and what's more we can then actually measure the one > way speed of light, not easily but if there are prefered frames then we can > see where length is longest and time is fastest, this will give us our > stationary frame. > > In addition, there is an easy way to measure the one way speed of light, > you simply need to synchronize your clocks in a reference frame that is > closer to the prefered frame than when you do the experiment with 2 clocks. > If the clocks are synchronized with a zero or 9relatively) low difference > in speed between the laboratory and the prefered frame then the > de-synchronization between them is zero or (relatively) low. > > If we then accelerate the laboratory (the clocks) to 99.99999995 of the > speed of light for arguments sake then the difference between the prefered > frame and the laboratory frame is huge, but we synchronized the clocks > without that large a degree of difference and now light goes MUCH faster in > one direction that the other according to our clocks synchronized in a > different frame. > > It is also note-worthy that essentially instantaneous communication (at > least not affected by Doppler shift) between a party moving near light > speed and one presumed to be stationary IS possible. > It just requires that you communicate with someone you are passing by in > your spaceship, the window of time is tiny but not zero unless you go into > orbit around then you can be in constant and with huge G-forces near > instantaneous communication. > > The point is that all he assumptions of Relativity fall apart and it is > kept together due to the reluctance to accept the existence of an aether > even though Noble Prize winning Physicist Frank Wilcze in his lecture music > of the void goes into detail about how matter itself seems to just be a > disturbance of space itself,just motion of "nothing" making something! But > obviously it's just that we don't know what is moving. > > This technology is of great importance and there is a real effort, maybe > even a non-human influence to dissuade us, consider how fast early progress > seems to have been made in this field, the World Fair I mentioned was in > Tesla's time, The research by Nazi's, a whole other can of worms, and > Tesla's and even evidence Marconi might have dabbled in this direction was > very early and things got shut down, both suppressed by those who have no > doubt developed the technology for themselves and also those who don't want > humanity at large to get this technology, there is ample reason to think > that there is ET involvement in back projects and the like, also it is > worth noting that freaky call to Art Bell when power was suddenly lost. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHXTfc6Jpvo&t=1s > > The point is that we have to consider that a lot has been opposing this > research at every turn! > > And, ironically even a list named Vortex because, well I presume the hint > is so strong that all of this mysterious phenomena is related to vortices, > indeed very strange phenomena, impossible phenomena similar to the > Hutchison Effect has been witnessed from Hurricanes and Tornadoes. > But even this list isn't actually receptive to such subjects! > > Thus it is no wonder that this doesn't go anywhere, there is just no > concerted effort, or, maybe more to the point there is a deafening silence > and disinterest! > > Nothing should interest man more, has more promise and potential than this. > So why is there this resistance? > > > I guess I have to end this somewhere. > > Jonathan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
