---- Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have these folks beat Goldes to the punch? > > http://www.akoil.ru/en/?PHPSESSID=73ea87b97edea4362eb8a48538ec1b70 > > "02.09.2006. For the first time in the world on 2d of September, 2006 > the first electromagnetic transformers of electric energy were > produced and tested. These transformers make electric energy of > different frequency and voltage without any fuel consumption. > > This year we are going to produce power stations with the power from > 5o kW to 10 MW. In 2007 we'll produce power stations from 1 kW to 100 > GW. > > Power stations production will be started in different Russian cities, > in different EU countries and in other countries all over the world. > The technologies are patented."
Certainly bold statements. I suspect few on this list are willing to take these claims seriously, not without additional collaborative evidence. Has anyone heard of "AKOIL-ENERGY" before? A side comment here: I find it fascinating that in the year of 2006, just a little over a century after the Wright Brothers flew into the historical books at Kitty Hawk, a number of companies appear to be on the verge of making what I would describe as an equally ground breaking announcement pertaining to highly controversial Over Unity energy devices. Or at least, that's what it would seem to me. Jed, I appeal to your historical perspective on this subject. Has anything like this happened in the past, where there appears to be a sudden increase in news or announcements coming from companies or individuals that claim they are on the verge of unveiling something momentous, something that would ultimately be considered highly disruptive in the technological sense, as these alleged devices would certainly be? Technological disruptions certainly do happen in our world. Perhaps these cyclical patterns can also be detected by a few, before the general public eventually catches wind. The mystery for me is how does one go about distinguishing whether these recent news announcements (concerning Over Unity) should be taken seriously, or do most of them bare the markings of a snake-oil salesman's pitch, and as such they should be thrown into the quackery bin. The only thing I can fall back on were the early reports of self-powered flying machines, when the Wright Brothers were first trying to get their contraption off the ground. As I seem to recall, a good number of initial news reports were extremely skeptical. Most news agencies did not take such claims seriously, including apparently the Scientific American publication. I would be curious to know what Mark Goldes might have to say about these recent developments. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.Zazzle.com/OrionWorks
