Apologies in advance for what may appear to many readers as beating a dead .. err ... "Trigger" perhaps - the subject matter being the future development of a fuel/oxidizer derived from treating water. Biomimicry applied to automobiles.

To me, this contentious subject of water-based fuel is not understood fully - and represents a neglected and overlooked niche in the energy picture ... therefore if nothing else, I feel obligated to get as much of it into print and as clearly as possible, since the next generation of Vo's may be motivated to pursue it, if the underfunded efforts in progress now come-up short.

Nature has presented a narrow window of opportunity - bona fide "almost-free energy" which can be derived from ambient heat, a little mechanical energy and free feedstock. Almost the entire cost of the end-product is the depreciation of the needed equipment. Future humans will be fools not to take notice of this - unless of course something better comes along (i.e. LENR, hot fusion, magnetic free-energy, etc.).

The skeptic might counter that HTP (high test peroxide), for instance, is not all that energetic, and not all that free since so much of it is needed. I think they are wrong. When decomposed, it is true that only 1380 Btu/lb is released, compared to 18,000 for gasoline - a ratio of 13-1; but that is misleading because the free oxygen, the most important part, is neglected. To burn gasoline efficiently one must highly compress lots of air - which accounts for incredible inefficiency in the bottom line. Any rational accounting of the benefit of HTP replacing air will show that a doubling of efficiency (or halving of consumption) is easily feasible.

In terms of cost - when produced in situ, the potential advantage of peroxide pushes towards infinity since the only real cost is in amortization of equipment - or "delay" ... and yes, time is money. But the bottom line is that peroxide forms naturally in oxygenated water in small amounts up to a low equilibrium state BUT when the new molecule is promptly removed (easy to do), more will continue to form continuously "for free" (almost free, anyway). It is fair to say that when used as the oxidizer, instead of air, for combustion - peroxide looks like a good alternative, yet no automotive company appears to be pursuing this technological avenue.

I will forego any conspiracy-theory innuendos, of the "who killed the electric car variety" ... for that present lack of interest by the Auto makers and attribute it to inertia, "not-invented-here" syndrome, and general ignorance of anything out of the ordinary.
END of half-hearted apology for another long post ...


                     Effects Observed with Magnetization of Water

A wealth of material concerning the action of magnetic fields on water has been collected from a number of (mainly) Russian Journals. For the time being, it is taken at face value, even though other Russian "lone-R&D" is suspect in the USA. Some of this information is already on the net, some is not. Much of the Russian results can be - and have been validated in simple experiments that anyone can perform using inexpensive equipment.

FACT: The physical and chemical properties of water change, and can change significantly, during extended magnetic treatment of H2O especially in situations where either the magnetic field is changed or the liquid flows, crossing the magnetic field lines - and especially where oxygen is added. In validation experiments, the magnetic field can be provided by large ferrite permanent magnets, which can be "boosted" on the active magnet face with stronger NIB magnets.

The oxy-magnetic treatment of water creates a number of many unexpected effects:

. The surface tension and electrical conductivity of water increase

. The solution rate of oxygen increases significantly (order of magnitude).

. Hydrogen peroxide and ozone in small concentrations is rapidly formed, depending on oxygen concentration. So long as the peroxide is separated and removed continually, it will continue to form up to a low equilibrium point (fractional percent).

. All catalytic processes involving oxidation or reduction speed up. Inexpensive metal colloids are very effective for this, and platinum group metals are not necessary.

. The chemical activity of the oxygen dissolved in water increases. This derives from the increase in "wetting-power" and electrochemical activity of water.

. There can be a natural cooling effect, probably based on the extraction of ambient heat during the formation of peroxide. It might be possible to use this surprising feature for air conditioning, in addition to making peroxide "on-the-fly" in an automobile.

. Extremely low voltage current (fractional volt) accelerates all of the above. Over time, even in a small reactor, it is possible to make significant amounts of hydrogen peroxide - gallons per hour - with little energy expenditure, mostly the 'pumping' or air or oxygen, which also can be arranged synergistically to provide the required mass transport of water - across field lines.

The energy input required can be approximated to be on the order of 300 BTU per pound of peroxide produced - in the optimum situation. This can compared to the energy "created" of 1380 BTU/lb plus the extra oxidizing capability which compared to compressing air in an ICE is equal to about 2000 more BTU. When used in a 5-1 ratio to combust ethanol, for instance, about half the effective net energy comes from the peroxide.

The source of this "almost-free" energy is simply ambient heat. No overunity or ZPE claim is made and none is necessary, even if the Casimir force may be somehow involved in the mechanics of superoxidation at the molecular level.

This is a natural process, and it responsible for a significant part of the energy consumed by all animals and most plants. You may be breathing air, but in every cell you are actually burning the calories - the carbohydrates but NOT burning with oxygen from air per se - instead the cell uses peroxides made from oxygen and water "on-the-fly" and that natural process is precisely what is being proposed here for automobiles (biomimicry).

Jones

Reply via email to