OrionWorks wrote: > Paul sez: > > ... > >> I've adapted my own style of physics and retired the >> pen and paper, lol. IMHO the future of physics is >> computer software. Computers are best at mathematics, >> speed, and memory. I view the Omniverse as one large >> computer. As far as PE, my present simulation software >> has no such magical PE. What I've described here at >> vortex is one thing, but only if you could experience >> what I've experienced through simulations. > > Living and experiencing the universe within the context of one's own created > computer "simulations" is no doubt a fascinating learning experience. No > doubt, it has its place in the greater scheme of things. I'm guilty of > having participated in this crime as well. However, it has been my > experience that the physical universe, particularly the one we all must > interface in, never asked me for my personal opinion on how she has chosen > to run the store. > > As the old saying goes: Garbage in, garbage out.
No offense intended, but that's Fuzzy Logic. First, it is not about getting nature to ask you about your personal opinion, lol. It is about asking nature how she does it. Second, I would take the computer over the pen and paper any time. You can have your pen and paper. Mathematics is the language of computers. Computers can compute any mathematics far faster, more precise, and more accurate than any pen and paper. Computers can juggle billions of such equations to formulate simulates. Third, your opening first two sentences were the only correct ones. Some people are followers. Some are a little head of time. Regards, Paul Lowrance ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
