[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Michel Jullian wrote: >> Paul, >> >> 1/ If you think the potential vs potential energy remark was just > humor, you are showing great ignorance. Look up the definition of > voltage = electric potential: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_potential >> >> "Electric potential is the potential energy per unit of charge > associated with a static (time-invariant) electric field, also called > the electrostatic potential, typically measured in volts." >> >> and then tell me if you click "voltage" and delete it too :) >> >> 2/ You seem to be eluding my question wrt the formulation of KE in > terms of work (below). Click "everything that doesn't fit" and delete it? >> >> Michel > > > > This is too funny. I keep telling you standard physics has no idea, > which is why they call it PE. Again, E-field is detectable, has > location, occupies space, and we can calculate its energy. If one > considers E-fields as PE then they truly believe everything is PE, > including KE. KE is detectable, has location, occupies space, and we > can calculate its energy. "Gee, lets call everything PE. Look at that > comet moving across the sky. Gosh, that's potential energy, therefore > lets call it potential energy." > > Paul Lowrance >
Why stop there? Lets call everything energy. ...I ate energy for lunch. ...Your energy needs fixing. ...Remember to take the energy for a walk! ...He dove into the energy. ...Why not sell your labour? After all it is just energy. Harry
