http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fPXewq8S5w
Another candle fake. On 2/9/07, John Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, well I would give this a freaking low chance of being real, even if I was ok with the open circuit I'd not be so fine with the fact it's symmetrical yet develops a DC voltage. However if you look when the flame goes out on the lighter that is exactly when the bulb turns on, so while the flame may take a second to become visible to us never the less the flame has been initiated. If it's a fake (99.9% chance it is) the only way to do it is to put holes in the table, or fine wires attacked to the nails, if only he had a hoop to pass the candle through ;) On 2/9/07, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nice fraud, orchestrated by the big candle wax lobbies no doubt :) It > would be more convincing if the bulb's light didn't turn on before the > second candle, and if it's luminosity wasn't constant!! > > Michel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:47 PM > Subject: [Vo]: A New Candle > > > > http://www.metacafe.com/watch/400937/candle_power_who_needs_batteries/ > > > >
