John Berry wrote: >> No one can explain every damn urban myth >> > >Amazing. >By saying this documented fact is an urban myth, you utterly demolished it.
No, I do not try to explain things about which I know nothing, which appearently signify nothing. "The police took the dogs away," you say. Assuming it is true, I am sure they had good reasons. Or do you think the K-9 police, who do this professionally, would simply go away without a word because someone ordered them to? Can you imagine a cop saying, "there may be dead or dying people, but the supervisor said to go, so I'm going." It would never happen! They would raise hell. >I think must be joking? >If not then besides the fact that it's just not ready for release, how about >oil companies, do you not believe they killed the electric car? Of course they did. The evidence is overwhelming. I knew about that 20 years ago. Such things are impossible to cover up. Heck, they bragged about it in the newspapers. They said "consumers don't want them," and Bush's spokesman said that consuming oil is our god-given right. >But are you saying that these people don't do evil things? I am saying that when someone destroys a building with explosives, the physical evidence for that event is overwhelming. >Why is a distinct flash seen just before the planes hit each building, and >all videos? I wouldn't know but I assume it sunlight or a video anomaly. I am sure the forensics experts can tell you, and they would not keep it a secret if it were caused by a rocket or weapon. Every forensic expert in the world has seen those videos. Your question reminds me of the assertion made by Branch Davidians that someone in the helicopter shown in the video was shooting at them with a machine gun. The judge who investigated the event pointed that the helicopter door was closed, and obviously the flashes were sunlight. >Here is a simple question as i know you can't answer the one above. > >What would it take for you to accept that 911 was an inside job? That's easy. We should demand the same level of proof that cold fusion research has produced. Any expert who takes a serious look at the evidence should be 100% convinced. It should be sigma 100 like the heat, or 60 times background like the tritium was in 1990, and a million times background later on. The physical evidence should be convincing and any counter-argument should be as weak as the nonsense Robert Park or Steve Jones spout when they try to "disprove" cold fusion. And why should we demand such high levels of proof? Because if these events actually did transpire, they would leave a mountain of incontrovertable evidence! That's the whole point. Experts in building demolition with explosives would see it instantly. They would have found physical evidence of it all over the place after the fact. Plus, as I said, it would be physically impossible to use explosives in this manner without first gutting the building, which would take months. Someone would notice. If this were something very difficult to establish, such as a top quark or a sighting of a rare species of bird, then it would be reasonable to settle for a lower standard of evidence, perhaps even including these absurd urban myths. But there is no need to consider such things. Destroying a building with these techniques is long-established, well understood engineering, and the world's top experts in the technique were on the site within hours. They would have taken one glance at the video and the remains and they would have been instantly sure that it was an explosive demolition. These people have done thousands of demolitions, over 50 years for goodness sake! Also, these people are not shy or prone to keeping secrets, and they are used to working with the police. They would have called a press conference and told everyone -- right away. For that matter, if they had any reason to think today so they would call a press conference now. Until you hear from Mark, Stacey and Fr! eddie Loizeaux that the Towers were brought down by explosives you can discount that possibility. They know roughly a thousand times more about that particular subject than Steve Jones does, just as Melvin Miles knows way more about recombination than Steve Jones does. Honestly, it is as if you wrote some scribble-scrabble on a piece of paper, and tried to pass it off as "Japanese writing" to me. I have been reading Japanese for decades and I know it when I see it. You could not fool me. Let me remind you that the experts who saw the planes hit knew instantly that the building would soon pancake straight down. It did not surprise any of them, and they knew the precise reasons why this would happen hours before the event occured. So why on earth do you think there is some alternative explanation that all of these experts overlooked?!? One that they were superbly qualified to recognize but they somehow missed? That's absurd. - Jed
