Well, it does bounce back from the object (e.g. solar sail) it imparted momentum to, with total momentum being conserved and all.
Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:09 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone > In my natural philosophy, light has an _apparent_ momentum, because the > nature of light is such that it refuses to be subjected to a mechanical > force. (I do mean "refuses" and not simply "resists"). > > Harry > > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> For a projectile what matters is momentum, and light does have momentum, >> that's what pushes solar sails. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure >> >> Michel >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "R.C.Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM >> Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone >> >> >>> Howdy Jones, >>> >>> You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind. One >>> must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before launching >>> into one of your posts <grin> that can range from rail guns to Ormus... and >>> that is a stretch. >>> >>> Now that light has been accepted as having "particle" or "weight", it can be >>> taken to the next step and think of light having "projectile force" >>> qualities. A rail gun projectile would not necessarily require a socalled >>> "mass" ( I have always been abhorred by the term mass). A better constructed >>> railgun would fire a " projectile of light"... hmmm.. a strange beasty >>> indeed.. Why so ? >>> Because the projectile could be " tuned" to either/or focus or impact. >>> Strange account of a battle predicted centuries ago where the flesh,eyes and >>> tongue will rot while they are still standing ( bones remain) Zec: 14. This >>> description seeems to indicate a type of a ray gun, however, the projectile >>> does not knock the person off their feet.. only dissolves the flesh. >>> >>> You referred to Barry Carter's Subtleenergy website that mentions a new >>> method of producing O3 and O6 but does not describe the process. He does >>> describe the healing qualities of vortex induced ormus water. Reminds me of >>> the account of the angel that would "stir" or "trouble" the waters in the >>> pool. Whoever would be the first sick person to enter the pool thereafter >>> would be healed. If the "stirring" means inducing a water vortex and only >>> the first person would be healed, could this mean the vortex was destroyed >>> by entering the pool and the residual remains of the vortex properties >>> dissappear? >>> >>> Out in the wildwood behind the Dime Box Saloon lurks an old whisky still >>> left over from the old days. The tale goes that sippin some that " thinkin >>> drinkin" stuff could make a person believe the earth was flat. >>> >>> Richard >>> >> >
