> For those who have not seen it, Xavier (Blaze Labs) posted a
> further
> strong detail towards a radical change in POV (point of view)
> towards
> our understanding of gravity.
>
> Mainstream science (Newton, Einstein, etc) is firmly on the
> opposite
> side of this issue, so to speak -- demonstrating once again, that
> YES,
> it is easily possible even in the enlightened year of 2007 for a
> large
> percentage - perhaps upwards to 95-99% of all physics PhDs to be
> totally
> in error on a basic premise underlying all of nature.
>
> Not that LENR advocates occasionally need that kind of reassurance
> ;-)
>
> New hard evidence in favor of electromagnetic radiation pressure
> theory
> of gravity has just been received from Glen F. Perry's data
> analysis of
> data logged from the Postdam super conducting gravim!
eter.
Newton's and Einstein's theory may be wrong and the push theory of gravity
may be able to explain _this_ data, but the push theory has some serious theoretical
difficulties to overcome. If gravity is a push why don't the planets spiral into the sun
because whatever is doing the pushing would also have a drag effect on the planets.
Harry
