The magnetic wankel. Cited by the patent examiner on H. Paul's patent. Paul says he thought of it playing with a dual rotor helicopter. Go figure.
Terry On 5/18/07, Paul Lowrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please include his full name-- Harry Paul. Anyhow, was this an accidental effect H.Paul discovered or was it a prediction by means of physics or is it an offshoot of another "free energy" machine? Paul Lowrance Terry Blanton wrote: > Paul had never been able to drive an electrical load before. With > such small torque, the motor would stall due to loading once even the > smallest current was drawn from the generator. PM generators load a > source even when open circuited due to core attraction and Lenz effect > eddy currents. The loading is heavy at coil core edges resulting in > an effect called cogging. > > With the Ecosmart generator he had to sand down the coil core edges to > minimize cogging. I also suggested that he "lift the rotor" of the > generator so that it is not entirely inserted within the stator PM > field. > > Finally, it would run open circuited on a two magnet rotor but stalled > once a current demand was added. So, Paul put on the four magnet > rotor which gave the additional torque. Based on power measurements > this configuration had a COP of over 3.0, INCLUDING THE GENERATOR > INEFFICIENCY. > > Terry > > On 5/17/07, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One overriding question... >> >> Why are there two Pringles left? >> >> No seriously ...why the focus on the small bulb? Assuming that it is not >> self-powered yet, what difference could the bulb make? >> >> >> >> >> >> Terry Blanton wrote: >> > Paul just posted a new video on youtube: >> > >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H07vGnZot0 >> > >> > It shows a four magnet rotor and a generator driving a load. The >> > energy per pulse did not change but the COP did (upward as would be >> > expected). >> > >> > Better hurry, I don't know how long the BoD will allow it to remain. >> > >> > Terry >> > >> > >> >> > >
