----- Original Message ----
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 2:10:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?
>
>
>
> On 02/18/2010 01:11 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
> >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >> Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 8:25:05 PM
> >> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?
> >>
> >> At 12:37 AM 2/16/2010, Wm. Scott Smith wrote:
> >>> I don't see the problem? Since when is it supprising if alternating
> >>> current
>
> >> or pulsed dc from one coil induces a current in another coil?
> >>
> >> That's not necessarily surprising in itself, but consider that the "input"
> coil
> >> is a toroid and the magnetic field is supposedly confined. Further, Naudin
> shows
> >> what happens when he lowers the "output" coil toward the input coil and
> >> the
> LEDs
> >> light up. The current and voltage in the input coil do not change.
> >>
> >> As his lights turn on, so should yours! He is showing that there is energy
> >> picked up by the output coil. That same energy could, instead, apply
> >> torque
> to a
> >> rotor, if it is timed right.
> >>
> >> With a normal transformer, load current will affect primary current. This
> >> is
> not
> >> a normal transformer. It's the Steorn/Orbo effect, all right. (Very likely
> >> related, that is.)
> >
> >>
> >> There may indeed be some effect on load current, but it is, at least,
> >> below
> what
> >> his instrumentation will show.
> >>
> >> If the laws of thermodynamics hold, we can expect that when energy is
> >> being
> >> drawn off by a pickup coil, less heat will be dissipated in the core....
> >
> >
> > And if it is a generator more heat will be dissipated?
>
> Right -- as much, or more; if it's a generator it may be 0% efficient.
> But if it's just a transformer its efficiency must be greater than 0.
>
> :-)
>
> By the way -- it's *not* the case that the presence of the pickup coil
> must make it dissipate less heat in the core, any more than it's the
> case that the presence of a receiver 20 miles downrange makes the
> transmitter at an AM radio station run cooler.
>
> Just because it looks like a transformer rather than a transmitter
> doesn't mean it behaves that way. (I've long since backed off from any
> claim that I fully understand this thing -- and that's why it's still so
> interesting, of course.)
>
Naudin has posted two more videos where he holds the magnet away from the
torodial coils so that the pickup coil is between the magnet and the toroidal
coil:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Nd9IuVJ3ww
and with a nanocrystalline alloy for the core:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdEd8jX0fZA
This time the current drops when the magnet is brought closer.
I am still puzzled how the magnetic field inside manages to vary the permanent
magnet's field magnetic outside the core. The logic of combining
a contained field to a pervasive field doesn't make sense to me.
I presume the core is emitting EM radiation. Does that play a role?
Harry
__________________________________________________________________
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo!
Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
