Steven V Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Many years ago Bill Gates said that Third World people do not need
> > computers, they need food and medical care. Gates is a great humanitarian
> > philanthropist, and he knew a lot about Third World conditions, but he
> was
> > wrong about that.
>
> My sediments as well.  One has to ask: after the third world is
> healthy, what will they do with the rest of their healthy lives.
>

On that subject, I love this quote from Samuel Florman:


. . . Our contemporary problem is distressingly obvious. We have too many
people wanting too many things. This is not caused by technology; it is a
consequence of the type of creature that man is . . .

It is common knowledge that millions of underprivileged families want
adequate food and housing. What is less commonly remarked is that after they
have adequate food and housing they will want to be served at a fine
restaurant and to have a weekend cottage by the sea. People want tickets to
the Philharmonic and vacation trips abroad . . . The illiterate want to
learn how to read. Then they want education, and then more education, and
then they want their sons and daughters to become doctors and lawyers. It is
frightening to see so many millions of people wanting so much. It is almost
like being present at the Oklahoma land rush, except that millions are
involved instead of hundreds, and instead of land, the prize is everything
that life has to offer.


- S. Florman, *The Existential Pleasures of Engineering* (St. Martin’s
Griffin, 1996), p. 76

I quoted this in chapter 21 of my book. Florman is great!

I *love* the idea that some kid in India or Africa right now is using a
laptop computer to download lesson plans from MIT and will go on to invent
some wonderful thing and become a multimillionaire. Like William Kamkwamba,
author of "The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind" who learned basic physics and
electrical engineering from a U.S.-government supported local library. This
will be more competition for our children, but it is the kind of competition
we want.

In the 1950s and 60s, Japanese families caught up with U.S. families in
living standards, education, health and most other metrics. I never got the
sense that we are poorer because they got richer. Naturally there is some
competition for scarce resources such as oil, but most resources nowadays
are things like silicon (sand) or bandwidth, which are available in
unlimited quantities. There seems to be quite a lot of space in Japan to
grow more food, if they ever decide to grow their own food again instead of
buying it from us. If they build food factories I am pretty sure their
entire agricultural production system would fit in less space than Osaka. It
would look a lot nicer than Osaka.

- Jed

Reply via email to