Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote:

> He doesn't mean he would have been physically killed!
>

I hope you are right about that. I hope he does not fear getting blow up.



>   He is well aware of the reason for doing the test, and that a finding of
> wet steam could seriously jeopardize his credibility.
>

Not really. As I pointed out before, 400 W * 60 s = 24,000 J/min, or 5,714
calories. The flow rate is 292 ml/min so the water temperature would rise
20°C, to 33°C. Wet steam has a lot more enthalpy than water at 33°C.



>   Thus, he was very concerned about the person doing the test properly, so
> they would get the right answer.
>

I get that impression. He seems earnest.

- Jed

Reply via email to