I meant to say....It seems to me suspicion as proof stems from a beliefthat the experiment is flawed or the interpretation of the experiment is just wrong so these kinds of skeptics are as much believers as the "cold fusion believers".
Harry > >From: Harry Veeder <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Tue, January 25, 2011 10:28:06 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:Your suspicion is not proof there is a problem > > >Jed, >that person writes, "With regard to my own current area of research, what's >interesting to me about the cold fusion story is the comparison of the >beliefs >and practices of the two camps (believers vs. skeptics) and their associated >affective emotional states." > >It seems to be suspicion stems from a belief that the experiment is flawed or >the interpretation of the experiment is just wrong so these kinds of skeptics >are as much believers as the "cold fusion believers". > >harry > > >> >>From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >>To: [email protected] >>Sent: Tue, January 25, 2011 9:40:20 PM >>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Your suspicion is not proof there is a problem >> >>I mentioned this fellow who thinks that McKubre does not know how to measure >>direct current electricity. This is in an exchange with long-suffering Ed >>Storms, here: >> >> >>http://knol.google.com/k/jed-rothwell/cold-fusion/2zjj2hvn3qzi5/2#comment-2zjj2hvn3qzi5.wwzfkv >> >> >> >>I added a few messages. I should know better. Trying to talk sense into these >>people is a fool's errand. >> >> >>- Jed >> >> >
