Lewan stated in his report: "The Thursday test took place on the same premises as the previous tests."
I've just been asking myself, "Is there anything learned from this test that could help analyze previous tests?". This test gives us some idea of the consistency of the temperature and flow-rate out of the public water system. Thus, should anyone care to go back to the previous 18 hour/high flow rate test and make the assumption that the flow-rate and temperature of the cooling water was as consistent as in this test, what is one to conclude about the 18-hour test? Just a thought before going to bed... -mark
