http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/04/slides-from-sept-22-nasa- lenr-innovation-forum-workshop/

Quote:
“Rossi changed the game totally.” the witness said. “From the test plan, the device, everything. There was nothing there that we had agreed on. He had a 30 liter reservoir in there and he wouldn’t even let us see what was in the box or weigh the box.”

On the second day, when the former NASA staff member asked Rossi if his device had an internal reservoir, Rossi became enraged. Quantum’s engineers left but NASA engineers offered to come back in a few days to give Rossi time to fix the flow. Rossi declined their offer. He said he was “too busy.”

End quote.

Earlier in another thread I wrote: "It is far more important that Rossi post his experimental plan in advance, so criticism arrives in time to make a difference, than to have a fixed web cam that makes no difference. The 24/7 option is a big improvement, however. There might be time to fix minor problems, like the location of the thermocouples."

I don't know which is more ridiculous, to put it mildly, my expectations as expressed above or Rossi's treatment of NASA. I am no doubt foolish to have any positive expectations of Rossi. I'd like to just forget about this segment of LENR history, but it is like trying to ignore a train wreck in progress. It is grotesque, horrific, and continuously unfolding, perhaps a tragedy of great proportions. I'd love to have the movie rights though.

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to