I'm quite curious about Mary's claim. I've only had a couple of business law classes in my years, and I would be curious: Is there really any law requiring registration of Chemically Assisted Low Energy Nuclear Reactions? If there is no measurable radiation, no possession or disposal of controlled substances, how could it be illegal (currently)? I contend that the action cannot be prohibited without being acknowledged. I'd love to get comments from anyone with a legal background.
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:54:43 -0800 Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat production in the US has begun From: [email protected] To: [email protected] On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Steven Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >From MY If Rossi is producing nuclear fusion reactors in the US, how was this authorized without an opportunity for public comment? Strikes me as an odd comment from MY, the staunch skeptic. Damned if you do. Damned if you don't. I don't understand the comment. To be plain, I don't believe Rossi is making nuclear fusion reactors in the US simply because he says so. That he says he is has about the same predictive value, IMHO, as if he didn't say anything.
