On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Akira Shirakawa <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hello group, > > Have a read at this. I can't tell whether these emails are to be trusted > or not (personally I believe they're authentic), but it appears that some > individuals in the US Department of Energy believe that LENRs are possible, > after all. > > Might this be a good thing? McKubre recently said that the reason why > researchers like him can work on LENR devices is that the DoE doesn't > believe that they can possibly work. But what they change their idea on > this matter? > > This is the website where this story originated, to my knowledge: > http://e-catsite.com/2011/12/26/more-helpful-e-mails-from-the-doe/ > The email, if genuine, suggests that DOE is going to let Rossi's scheme and presumably Defkalion's, whatever those are, play out before making more decisions. Would it not be true that if Rossi and/or Defkalion are at all truthful, then the whole issue of LENR research is moot? Won't it bloom rapidly, without DOE support, if that's proven to be the case? And if they're not, won't all the credulousness exhibited in the support they've been shown hurt the field?
