At 03:28 PM 12/27/2011, Charles Hope wrote:
If the helium levels are "what they should be" compared to the heat, that assumes some theory that correlates them. Which theory is that?

This is an experimental observation, and what you are asking was stated. Helium is produced in PdD cells, when the FPHE effect is observed and heat is measured, and helium is collected and measured, at what Storms estimates as 25 +/- 5 MeV/He-4.

If deuterium is converted to helium, the energy released is 23.8 MeV/He-4. So the hypothesis here would be that the reaction is somehow converting deuterium into helium. For this purpose it is not necessary to know what the reaction is, as long as there are no other energy sinks. (For example, energy lost to neutrino emission.)

Krivit has criticised the work that was the basis for Storms' estimate, mostly over details of little consequence. Regardless, when Miles reported energy/He-4 that was within an order of magnitude of the value expected for deuterium fusion, Huizenga, who might be considered the leader of the skeptics, he did more to torpedo cold fusion in the early days than anyone else, as co-chair of the 1989 ERAB panel, thought the Miles work was astonishing, solving a major riddle of cold fusion (the ash!), but he then added his expecation that Miles would not be confirmed. After all, there were no gamma rays, which would certainly be expected from d + d -> He-4.

He was obviously assuming that if there was a reaction, it would be straight, normal d+d fusion. Obviously, it isn't.

But *any reaction that converts deuterium to helium* will produce that much energy. This is not a proof, but reactions that produce that much energy per helium nuclear product are rare. I'm not aware of any. Of course, this is indeed an "unknown nuclear reaction," so ... we don't know.

Just as an example of a different reaction that would produce the same energy, though, Takahashi's Tetrahedral Symmetric Condensate "motion" causes, in theory, collapse and fusion of four deuterons to form a single excited Be-8 nucleus. What happens then is unclear. Normally, Be-8 has a very short lifetime, on the order of a femtosecond, decaying into two helium nuclei plus 47.6 MeV.

The magic number, 23.8 MeV/He-4. No gamma would be expected.

However, still no cigar, Takahashi hasn't earned his Nobel yet, perhaps. If the energy appears in the helium nuclei, if they were 23.8 MeV each, as kinetic energy, there would observable effects that are not observed. Those would be very hot alpha particles, they would Do Stuff, to use the technical term. To give an idea of why Something Completely Different might happen, that Be-8 is formed inside of a Bose-Einstein Condensate, and we have no idea what to expect as the behavior of a highly unstable radioisotope that forms inside a BEC. One possibility that looms is that the energy would be distributed among all the consituents of the BEC, which, for starters, might be larger than four deuterons. The deuterium in the BEC is molecular deterium, possibly. It includes the electrons. They might carry away quite a bit of the energy.

And studying this stuff, experimentally, is apparently very, very difficult. Especially without funding!

Reply via email to