Titanic step forward? Better is gigantic management strategy blunder! To use mild euphemisms- this plan is naive, childish, primitive savage capitalistic thinking and self-destructive strategy. To use dumping on an endless, insatiable market- you cannot succeed even with a hundred million E-cats. And to kill (!) the competition is as counter-productive as impossible. It is very surprising that Rossi accepts now that the competition exists. This plan is similar with thinking in the '70s that the Trabant car can eliminate all the other cars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trabant or now that the Tata Nano car http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Nano can conquer the world market. Selling price is just one factor of many... This is a fantastic plan, in the worst sense of this adjective. Peter On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat <[email protected]>wrote: > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-**physics.com/?p=563&cpage=7#** > comment-157900<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=7#comment-157900> > > * > Andrea Rossi > December 27th, 2011 at 2:33 PM > <http://www.journal-of-**nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&** > cpage=7#comment-157900<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=7#comment-157900> > > > > > Dear Gherardo: > The price will be enough low to forbid any competition. At that > point the reverse engineering will be a hobby, not a source of > competition, so that everything will become easier. This is the > battle we won during these days: we made a titanic step forward, > derived from a lucky idea and from the huge possibilities our new > Partners have opened to us. The price will be much lower than you > said, but we will declare the price when we will be ready: remember, > if I say one thing, I have to do it. Anyway: the first version will > produce hot water and heating, but it will be able to be retrofitted > with the electric power generation when we will be ready also with it. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > * > Andrea Rossi > December 27th, 2011 at 2:25 PM > <http://www.journal-of-**nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&** > cpage=7#comment-157894<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=7#comment-157894> > > > > > Dear Frank Acland: > 1- We are making it > 2- We will necessaruly have to do this. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > * > Frank Acland > December 27th, 2011 at 2:06 PM > <http://www.journal-of-**nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&** > cpage=7#comment-157890<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=7#comment-157890> > > > > > Dear Andrea, > > You mention the need to produce 1 million e-cats immediately in > order to meet your goals. This is certainly ambitious, but it would > be very exciting for you to be able to do this. > > 1. Do you have the production infrastructure (including outsourcing) > to build this many plants? > 2. Are you process enough nickel powder to fuel this many e-cats? > > Wishing you the very best for 2012! > > Frank Acland > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
