What part do you not understand:
a. the mechanism of trapping of the post fusion nuclear electron
b. the low energy state of the post fusion nuclear electron
c. the mechanism by which the trapped electron absorbs the
fusion energy
d. why the fusion energy is not sufficient to eject the post
fusion nuclear electron
e. the ability of the post fusion trapped nuclear electron to
radiate
Just to be clear, I am talking about my theory here, deflation
fusion, not any other. I think these things have been described in my
articles, but often when I look back I find material that was posted
but not included in any article, but which I had assumed was included
in an article. Sometimes it takes me months to find things, and in
the interim I think maybe they were figments of my imagination.
On Dec 30, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
I didn't understand this part "from the intermediate nucleus
vicinity in small increments by a trapped electron."
2011/12/30 Horace Heffner <[email protected]>
On Dec 30, 2011, at 7:21 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Oh, nice! That's why he also congratulated you in that report. I
didn't go to the talk or take part in the CMNS list, so I cannot
know. I am happy that I got to similar conclusions as you did
independently. Several people reaching the same conclusions, in
similar ways, is a sign of things going into the right direction.
But I am still not sure how to get rid of the gamma rays.
You don't have to worry about big gammas if there are none
produced. You don't have to worry about getting rid of gamma rays
if they are released from the intermediate nucleus vicinity in
small increments by a trapped electron.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
