I agree Gibbs is just writing filler pieces but the way he bends the facts and creates straw men to aggravate LENR proponents into doing his homework is infuriating, We never said it was fusion or that it was known physics -both of which premises he assumes to support his skeptical platform while ignoring the unexplained transmutations being recorded - I guess "data" that doesn't fit known physics can't be considered or he might have to earn his paycheck and actually read some of the papers.
Fran
