Alain Sepeda wrote: <<many (not all) Green will try to oppose LENR because it is agains their agenda. it is breaking their plot to make a better world by reducing comfort, energy, consumption, sins, and corruption of the nature>>
You don't know what you are talking about. You are just parroting misrepresentative B.S. peddled by ideologically, politically or financially biased propagandists. Greens are used to being traduced like this. The mainstream green movement does not yet acknowledge the reality of LENR because we have been approached by an endless stream of people claiming magic 100mpg carburettors, magic magnet motors, overunity hydrogen generators, MEGs etc etc etc over many decades. In short, all magic solutions so far have been lies and bullshit so, until conclusively demonstrated and accepted, we're not going to change any priorities yet. I can assure you that around 15 years ago, a motion was taken to the Friends of the Earth Conference: "This Conference notes the recent proliferation of reliable scientific evidence for the reality of "Cold Fusion" energy and many other similar devices. As they herald the rapid end of both the nuclear and fossil fuelled industries, and hold out the prospect of cheap, abundant, pollution free energy, free from the control of individual nations or large corporations, they will obviously have a dramatic effect on most of our campaigning. This Conference calls upon the Board of Friends of the Earth to investigate the scientific reports, satisfy themselves as to the validity and potential of the new energy sources and then to rewrite our basic campaign strategies to take the coming revolution in energy supply into account and, further, to actively promote the new devices as a solution to global warming and pollution. When these devices become mainstream we will be fully prepared to "hit the ground running"." Unfortunately, back then, the evidence was by no means clear cut and, although there was plenty of interest (and some excitement) in the concept, the view was that the best thing to do was to wait it out. Decentralisation of energy supply and the cost and energy effective conservation and recycling of materials is an incredibly deep aspect of green thought, all of which would be achievable with LENR devices. In 1996 I wrote an article for Infinite Energy (click for link) that speculated that, although there could be some novel problems if everyone had as much energy as they desired, that overall the environemental effect of LENR would be beneficial as it would enable the Green movement to concentrate more on habitat and biodiversity protection and all the other stuff apart from climate change and peak oil. Nick Palmer On the side of the Planet - and the people - because they're worth it Blogspot - Sustainability and stuff according to Nick Palmer http://nickpalmer.blogspot.com
