I recall Rossi stating that D2 would poison his system. Could that suggest that electrolysis might not be a good source of pure H2? Maybe this concern is based upon an issue that really does not exist.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Robert Lynn <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Jan 5, 2012 9:50 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hydrogen safety compared to gas safety I'll be surprised if home LENR does not eventually use high pressure electrolysis cells to make hydrogen - it is a much safer (and possibly cheaper) solution than having someone come around to swap out a large cylinder of high pressure hydrogen every 6 months, and would minimise the danger. However Rossi/Defkalion will probably still use hydrogen gas bottles for initial production because it is simple. On 5 January 2012 14:40, Energy Liberator <[email protected]> wrote: I was wondering about the safety of hydrogen cylinders in homes. Wouldn't it be better to produce the hydrogen by electrolysis and instead of storing it? The system could produce a small amount at a time and does it in a small chamber replenishing it as it's required. Alternatively, some safety system would need to be incorporated which would vent the hydrogen to atmosphere via a duct or flue in an event a problem arises like fire. From: Alain Sepeda Sent: Thu, Jan 5, 2012 12:49 PM To: [email protected] CC: Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hydrogen safety compared to gas safety to feed the discussion, beside wikipedia data, here is airliquide encyclopedia page on hydrogen http://encyclopedia.airliquide.com/encyclopedia.asp?LanguageID=11&CountryID=19&Formula=&GasID=36&UNNumber= 2012/1/5 Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> Hi, discussion about radiation risk, make me think about Hydrogen explosion risk on Ni+H reactors for dayly use... ...
