Rossi seems to have trouble even keeping track of what he writes on his own
blog.

Here, the device has an output of 5 kW net:

   1.  Andrea Rossi
    January 6th, 2012 at 12:10
PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=10#comment-165106>

   Mr ” Tom Jones”:
   Since you used (a little bit cowardly) a fake name to make your comment,
   I can say without fear to damage you: what a stupid comment! Of course the
   E-Cat is a water heater, all the persons who have pre-ordered it and who
   will buy it know perfectly that it is what we always said it is: a water
   heater. With a difference between a normal water heater and the E-Cat: the
   normal water heaters use gas or oil or electricity in a measure bigger than
   the thermal energy produced heating the water, while the E-Cat makes 6 kWh
   consuming 1 kWh.
   Good Bye, “Tom Jones”.
   A.R.


Here, it's 10 kW:


   1.  Andrea Rossi
    January 6th, 2012 at 11:42
AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=41#comment-165083>

   Dear K. Dobrolecki:
   We must make a distinction between the price of the industrial plants
   and the price of the domestic plants.
   For the industrial plants ( the 1 MW plants) the price from 2012 will be
   around 1,500.00 US$/kW, moreless 10%.
   The domestic E-Cats of 10 kW will be manufactured with a different
   technology and with a very good economy scale, due to the fact that we have
   started the production of 1 million pieces; such scale, obviously, will
   reduce by an order of magnitude the costs. If all goes as I hope and as I
   am working for, the 10 kW E-Cats will cost between 100 and 150 US$/kW. This
   fact will:
   1- allow to everybody to buy an E-Cat
   2- cancel the competition
   The reverse engineering will be, I think, impossible, due to a system we
   invented for this purpose, but even if somebody will succeed to do it, it
   will anyway be impossible for him to compete economically. The 1 MW plants
   have a totally different technology and engineering.
   Warm Regards,
   A.R.

A "different technology"?  What "technology" is that?

From:  http://www.rossilivecat.com/

Reply via email to