very care no O2 no H2O little propane sent thrrough pipe 4 Ts 4 slpark plug use 4 auto coil with buz control very good very hot big big steam big big pressude 600C easy easy you try
CP
Chemical Engineer
Wed, 30 May 2012 02:14:57 -0700
Peter, I will assume the propane is providing the source for the atomic hydrogen as opposed to using H2 gas supply. I will assume the propane breaks down across the spark gap (given enough juice) into atomic hydrogen and carbon (soot). As long as your reactor kernal remains air tight and small volume i will assume you do not blow yourself up. As atomic hydrogen association can create extremely high localized temperatures (3000-5000C) i will assume you have to be very careful not to melt just your powder/core but the reactor walls/chamber itself. I will assume the carbon might dampen this out. This i will assume is one of the reasons why DGT has such a thick reactor block. I will also assume the very high, localized atomic hydrogen association heat release in addition to anomolous heat Is what creates the bright glow and cracked the glass in the DGT unit. If you thought atomic hydrogen welding was bad ass think nuclear welding. I am encouraged using propane because i am already experienced with almost blowing myself up grilling burgers. I will assume i do not know what the hexane is for other than to keep air out and just another H provider. Of course i have made alot of assumptions and you know what happens when you ASSume too much! On Wednesday, May 30, 2012, Peter Gluck wrote: > Dear Integral - or Chang? > > Thank you, but you have NOT answered my original question that refers to > the classic Pd-D cell and to the nanopowder hydogen systems, the questiona > nd problem is IF their 3 damned weaknesses are inherent, generated by their > very nature. Or not. > You are describing your proprietary system, give the data you consider not > secret, claim it is working, but do not tell how long and do not give > the basic parameters. You have removed the weaknesses- that is admirable > and I hope the system will become useful on a great scale. I don't get the > role of propane, hope it is not burned. > my best technological good wishes to you. > Peter > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:50 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > More, > > http://www.mail-archive.com/**[email protected]/msg64616.**html<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg64616.html> > > Gluck,
