On 2012-07-07 17:38, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
I did! Thanks. Akira. As both you and Jed Rothwell point out there is the light weight HTML version, which was a lot easier to access. [...]
I think the probable reason why the "flashy" version was made that way is because it's not much more than a digital "dump" of the printed issue. It's provided for convenience and additional public reach but it's not really meant to be read on a pc.
An edition specifically intended for online consumption would have probably been laid out differently.
Cheers, S.A.
