On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> wrote:
> ** > 3. In the case of this Papp engine. The stronghold argument consists of > asking why after 30 years, is there still no viable Papp engine we can > buy. We can argue about whether confinement, gremlins, Rydberg matter or > plasma is the source of the power, but until we can answer this simple > question, all those arguments are irrelevant. > The most likely explanation. other than the criminal conspiracy theory involving Papp and the Rohner brothers I previously put forth in some detail, is that Papp deliberately excluded a key piece of information from his patent. Papp's patents were never valid outside the US's "first to invent" policy -- although the technology may, indeed, be valid. I say this is the most likely (of the "its real" theories) because, to the best of my knowledge, no one ever provided third party-validated reports of the technology working in his absence. Its very much akin to Rossi's "secret ingredient" story.
