I believe I've responded to it my friend, just not directly to you. My
response to you was the same response to Lomax.
My response is repeated below:
Just because the practice of sexual relations with 9 year old little girls
was common, widespread and accepted in the Arabian peninsula during the time
of muhammed does not mean that the practice is not CREEPY. Hindus have
corrected this same practice and stopped having sexual relations with little
girls several hundred years prior to muhammed's time. The Hindus did it,
and yet a "progressive" prophet like muhammed did not stop this retrograde
practice.
My friend, just because your neighbors do it, does not mean you have to do
it. Nor that it justify your actions. Molesting 9 year old little girls is
just CREEPY, abhorrent and wrong, whatever the time period, or whatever
everyone else is doing.
Jojo
PS. Note that this response is not a violation of my promise to stop
insulting. Note that this is not an insult, just true facts. And this is
also a post directed to me.
I said I promised to stop posting unless there are insults or question
directed to me. This is a question directed to me.
----- Original Message -----
From: "de Bivort Lawrence" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:List integrity
That a statement is endlessly repeated does not make it true.
I posted at length on the family practices of the Arabian peninsula, as they
pertained to Christian, Jewish, and pantheistic communities, and to the
pre-revelatory emergence of Islam, which limited some of the practices that
many people today criticize.
But Jojo seems not to have seen this posting, though he did say he would
respond to it (and this I hope from his own knowledge rather than
assertian-based pseudo-sources), for he repeats assertions that are shown in
the posting to be flat-out incorrect.
On Dec 31, 2012, at 2:16 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
<[email protected]> wrote:
At 10:37 PM 12/30/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Hence, in you, the corruption of islam is seen by everyone. The same
corruption that justifies to the world that it is OK to fondle a 9 year
old
little girl BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS, just because other people are doing
it.
No matter how you justify it, that's CREEPY.
BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. What
is
obviously false does not become more true by being repeated over and
over.
Jojo actually acknowledged that this one was false, but has continued to
emphasize it.
Jojo is using hyperbole so calling it false is an ineffective repsonse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole
Harry
