I think 95% of the universe's energy is collapsed and locked behind that small surface area of "particles" that I consider micro black hole balls of entropy. Which is very good for life else the tremendous heat and radiation would kill us. Interestingly, if you run the calculator at the following link:
http://xaonon.dyndns.org/hawking/ You will see that at around a mass of 4.5e+20 kg, the surface of a micro black hole is ~ 32 F, masses below that quickly get very hot, with a particle of mass 1e+10 kg hot enough to trigger thermonuclear fusion at its surface. Masses above that get very cold, approaching 0 K very fast. The reason I believe we are protected as humans is that there is not enough surface area there to transfer much heat to our world, plus quantum gravity red-shifts any radiation leaving the surface. If you consider the core of the earth a black hole @ a mass of 1.2 e+23kg, you get a core temperature of 1 deg. K and a radius of 0.007 inches. The electromagnetic radiation leaving a black hole is 40 times the gravitational force energy. In other words I believe the Earth's core dynamo is a black hole, which explains our magnetic fields, tail and coronal discharge after CMEs. At 0.007 inches the core cannot suck in the Earth due to its outer core atmosphere/pressure it creates from the radiation. All of the dark matter particles the Sun expells at us just coalesce with the core of the Earth, effectively recharging her battery, and emit about 3% as cosmic rays, some of which I believe contribute to Earth's Energy Balance. I believe those particles are orbiting the sun in those magnetic flux tubes, with an average mass of approx 1e+15 kg and 1.5 M Kelvin and when there is a flare/CME those flux tubes break and expell these orbiting particles at Earth. Our major low pressure weather systems on Earth are those same magnetic flux tubes we see on the sun. This stuff is energetic and orbiting in our jet streams at hundreds and thousands of miles per second. I also have a problem with cosmologists that cannot see the forest thru the trees. I have a disprovable theory here on Earth and I am using it to predict events, and learning as I go. Hurricanes are caused by orbiting entropic particles expelled from the sun during CMEs, I am convinced. The weirdest thing is that is what some of the crop circles have been showing us and I have never believed in weird stuff like that, I used to be a normal engineer like Terry... Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW – this interesting paper turned up just now in pursuit of other > models of “mirror hydrogen” (there are many besides the one of Robert Foot, > which is the most well-known).**** > > ** ** > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0111381.pdf**** > > ** ** > > Stewart’s view seems to be somewhat similar, but now we are presented with > an introduction to the desirability of “self-interaction” to explain > certain cosmological phenomena - which is poorly defined – despite having a > Wiki entry. **** > > ** ** > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-interacting_dark_matter**** > > ** ** > > In layman’s terms, it suggest why cold dark matter has plenty of internal > energy. Amazing that cosmologists get away with that kind of speculation > simply because disproof is so difficult … but this type of mirror hydrogen > would probably not be seen outside of galactic cores. **** > > ** ** > > “Self-interacting” sounds a bit like LENR gain on a larger scale however JIn > fact, if we continue with what they are started, there could be a > version of mirror hydrogen that can be formed in Solar flares and exist in > Earth-like environments, or even be formed in relativistic conditions on > Earth. In fact, Randell Mills version of redundant ground states goes part > of the way there. The “mirror” symmetry would exist in the negative > (reflected) valence and ground states, which can be imagined as a mirror of > positive states - but to be complete, this kind of mirror hydrogen would > need to be combined with a bit of QCD magic in mirrored quarks - for the > self-interaction (even if is of a smaller degree), such as can be inferred > from the Mohapatra paper above. It would be nice to see this paper updated > within a broader scope.**** > > ** ** > > If one accepts cosmological self-interaction, what is prohibit a local > version, at least as seen in the Ni-H reaction? It could be a limited > variety of “self-interaction” of mirror hydrogen formed in situ and having > self-oscillation between highly redundant ground states and QCD color > change - in mirrored quarks.**** >
