Dave,

If the interaction of Dark Matter/Energy (~95%) and Baryonic Matter(~5%)
results in Beta Decay/LENR, transmutations and mutations, I would say life
is possible anywhere as long as the level of Dark/Vacuum Energy is not to
high in that region of space.  Weak Anthropic Principle at work.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4165
http://astro.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkmatter/hdm.html

Quite a cosmic stew that we live in.  My research tells me red tide, which
gets worse after Hurricanes is part of that cosmic stew.
http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/01/04/cosmic-seafood-gumbo/

Stewart




On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:11 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

> And then there is the report of Rossi and Defkalion.  Well, at least they
> insist that their systems are working and I have my fingers crossed that
> one day soon we will hear about good confirmation.
>
>  In my estimate, there is some evidence that these and others are seeing
> good excess power.  The work on Pd D appears to be sound, so it would not
> surprise me too much to find that nature has developed a method of
> extracting this form of energy provided the ignition does not require more
> than she can muster.  I agree that a small advantage could yield a large
> payoff for the organism that is fortunate enough to unlock LENR.
>
>  If we pursue this line of reasoning, are you aware of any natural source
> of energy that can be tapped at a relatively modest temperature not being
> used by some life form?   The mid ocean ridges come to mind as an example
> of unusual energy support.  Hot springs have abundant life within.  What
> about the energy tapped by battery type action?   If I recall, there are
> some bacteria species that eat through metal underwater.  Perhaps they use
> the water Ph as one side of the reaction.  I am not aware of any life that
> uses the release of natural radioactive decay energy to grow, but someone
> else might have good examples.
>
>  So, if it is assumed that LENR can be released at temperatures that  do
> not result in the loss of life for all bacteria, then it might be expected
> to be utilized.  I guess you could say I am making a point that life should
> be able to live just about under any circumstances both on Earth and
> elsewhere.  That initial step from chemical to life is the key.
>
>  Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones Beene <[email protected]>
> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wed, Feb 6, 2013 11:45 am
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Chemolithotrophs and Ni-H
>
>  Dave,
>
> Here’s the problem.
>
> If you look at the reliable Ni-H experiments going back to Thermacore’s
> work for DARPA, up to Celani and the replications – the proved COP is
> rather low - and there is no evidence that it is really “nuclear,” even if
> we call it LENR.  There are really no other trustworthy experiments to base
> things on.
>
> In fact a COP of 1.3-1.5 is probably all that can be expected - if we base
> things on all the facts available.
>
> However, COP =1.5 is a huge incentive for survival in those conditions. In
> fact, any COP over one would be rapidly selected by the evolutionary
> mechanism, no?
>
> *From:* David Roberson
>
> This would be a fine development if it turns out that LENR is used by
> these organisms.  Some of the parameters required for the use of LENR might
> be revealed to help us in our quest.
>
>  Do you think that the quantity of rocks consumed would give some
> indication of whether or not LENR were active?   I would expect it to take
> a small quantity if nuclear energy were available for the organism.
>
>  Dave
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones Beene
>
> If life on earth has ever evolved to use LENR for survival in extreme
>
> conditions, then evidence of that would likely be  found in deep cold lakes
>
> in Antarctica. We talked about this earlier when it looked like the Russians
>
> were about to drill deep enough - but they had equipment failure.
>
>
>
> Now, for the first time, life-forms from deep under the Antarctic ice have
>
> been found at a site called Lake Whillans by a US team. Well, they are not
>
> sure yet what they have, but they found what looks like single celled
>
> organisms. Lots.
>
>
>
> This variety of extreme life was surviving under a half-mile of ice at
>
> temperatures below freezing. Water pressure keeps the water from turning
>
> solid. No light gets there. The life-forms apparently survive by "eating
>
> rocks" and are called "chemolithotrophs."
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithotroph
>
>
>
> Over thirty years ago, Nickel was shown to be required as a trace element
>
> for survival of five strains of the more extreme chemolithotrophs
>
> Alcaligenes eutrophus, Xanthobacter autotrophicus, etc. (Archives of
>
> Microbiology
>
> February 1980, Volume 124, "Nickel requirement for chemolithotrophic growth
>
> in hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria" but there are articles about nickel
>
> requirements in these organisms going back much further)
>
>
>
> We will not know for months what strains of chemolithotrophs were found
>
> recently, or if they require nickel for survival. Of course, there is no
>
> harm in predicting that if nickel is found to be necessary - there is a real
>
> good case for some kind of LENR being used as an energy source.
>
>
>
> And even if iron alone is enough - perhaps LENR can take place with iron as
>
> well as nickel under those circumstances.
>
>
>
> Original story here:
>
>
>
> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/02/130205-antarctica-ice-life-m
>
> oons-science-environment-lakes/
>
>

Reply via email to