the experimenters are writing about essential things here: http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/follow-2/206-tgoc The Genius of Celani
Peter On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > That was not directed to you, but to Jed... > > > 2013/2/6 David Roberson <[email protected]> > >> By all means Dan. I hope that the calorimeter shows excess power, but I >> would not be surprised to see otherwise after reviewing the data. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> >> To: John Milstone <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed, Feb 6, 2013 2:39 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP Null Result >> >> I guess you did not understand the question or I don't know how to >> express myself well. Either way, let's wait to see the flow calorimetry. >> >> >> 2013/2/6 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >> >>> Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> That was not my question. I want to know if he is also fitting excess >>>> heat with his curve and thus giving false negatives. >>>> >>> >>> I am saying I think it is just a slight instrument bias. >>> >>> Anyway, even if it is 0.6 W positive, that is not significant. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> [email protected] >> > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
