RE: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved

[Jones Beene]

 

 

From: Bob Higgins 

 

I don't understand why 62Ni would make a difference in the reaction.  Are we
now seriously considering that the Ni nucleus participates in the nuclear
reaction that causes the heat

 

IMO this is a "Mills type" reaction (BLP), involving deep hydrogen
redundancy - and the Ni does not transmute into another element. 

 

This particular isotope is simply a much better catalyst for deep redundancy
at the 300 eV level. This mechanism goes beyond Randell Mills theory into QM
and wave function collapse, which Mills rejects.

 

Rossi and Focardi apparently believe that nickel transmutes to copper, but
the proof offered indicates otherwise. Others believe that protons fuse to
deuterium. There is no proof of that.

 

Many qualified observers, at this stage, have markedly different opinions. 

 

However, it is worth repeating that if it is a nuclear reaction - there
should be gamma radiation and/or radioactive ash. There is none.

 

Jones