Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
> And why would they demonstrate the magnetic field? > To show that it is real, obviously, and not an error with the Gauss-meter. They should demonstrate the magnetic field for the same reason they should demonstrate that the steam is real by pulling the hose out and showing the plume and then sparging the steam for a minute to prove there is 500 g of vaporized water, mostly dry steam. This is a crude method but it works. It is indisputable. When you make a dramatic claim, you should prove it by two or more different methods. A flowmeter is good of course but it can always be wrong. It would very convenient to sparge the steam. It takes only a few minutes and equipment such as a bucket and a weight scale which are available at any lab. This would prove beyond question that the flowmeter was correct. "Suspenders and a belt" as they say. Why prove it only way when you can just as easily prove it two ways? > That would be a hassle and hell would break lose. > Not a hassle at all. Why would hell break lose? If hell is likely to break loose because of this claim, they should not make the claim at all. Keep it secret.There is no point to making a dramatic claim with insufficient proof. > It would even interfere with the controls. > It will do that anyway, if it is real! I do not see your point. - Jed
