as i says in the article, there is a sad tendency to focus on easy frauds debunked quickly, and to miss the huge failure of big Journals like nature&co :
- Pal -review, kingmakers, kerberos... which prevent "enemies" to publish . many case identified today from different source, and minimized each time, ans "not a problem". - consensual fraud, which are nearly never identified, because the result is too much pleasing. fraud induced by desperate greed is much less dangerous for the society than consensual collective delusion, and professions who grow on faulty science, for sometime centuries. 2013/12/10 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > This is a breath of fresh air. It is similar to what Pam Boss et al. wrote > in the JCMNS the other day: > > How the Flawed Journal Review Process Impedes Paradigm Shifting Discoveries > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedk.pdf#page=6 >
