I posted the earthquake chart on my blog: http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/02/15/expanded-quantum-capabilities/
and I posted my statistics a month ago. http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/12/26/boom-bang-shake-quake/ I also believe p-Values are only a tool and do not identify cause, they just imply a relationship, which I was seeing visually. Oklahoma City is Home to the National Weather Research Center and along with the air force base has ~ 9 overlapping microwave radars within a 50-100 mile radius (range on dopplers is approx. 150 miles) I have developed a very bad feeling a microwave radars over the past 6 months, especially when 3 or 4 are overlapped. Stewart On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:25 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, Kansas > > The area of North Texas, Oklahoma, So. Kansas and Western Arkansas has had > >3000 seismic events which jumped in 2009 > > Fracking has been going on for years and there does not seem to be a > direct link but it may have some impact > > > http://www.examiner.com/article/oklahoma-s-4-yr-long-quake-swarm-is-not-normal-and-it-ain-t-freakin-fracking > > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What three states? >> >> >> >> I'm thinking there could another factor not in evidence ... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* ChemE Stewart >> >> >> >> Any open minded guys here have any thoughts/ideas/theories on how the >> installation of a Doppler microwave weather radar with the following specs >> might trigger a ten-fold increase in seismic events/sonic booms within a 50 >> mile radius of the tower for the past 3 years compared to the previous 10? >> My p-Value stats over two years data says there is a correlation (which >> does not prove causation) - I looked at 3 states of seismic data and approx >> 30 radar locations >> >> >> >> · Operating frequency: 5510 MHz (C-band) >> >> o Wavelength: 5.44 cm >> >> o Pulse Length: 0.4, 0.8, 1.0, 2.0 µs >> >> o Pulse Repetition Frequency: 300-2000 Hz, 1 Hz step >> >> · *1 MW Peak Power (magnetron with solid-state modulator) * >> >> · 8.5-meter Andrew precision C-band dish >> >> o High angular resolution: 0.45 degrees @ -3 dB points >> >> o Gain: 50 dBi >> >> o Sidelobe Level: Better than -26 dB one-way >> >> o Cross-Pol: Better than -30 dB >> >> · Rotation rate: 6-25 deg/s under typical scanning (30 deg/s max) >> >> · Minimum Detectable Signal: -112 dBm >> >> o Radar Sensitivity: -15 dBZ at 50 km >> >> o Noise Figure: 3 dB >> >> · Simultaneous dual-polarization >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Nigel Dyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I also think it may be relevant to certain classes of LENR, particularly >> the Graneau/Papp systems. Even low voltage systems may see localised very >> high voltage differences as a result of back-emf effects when currents are >> flowing between two surfaces that are initially in contact and are then >> separated. >> Nigel >> >> On 15/02/2014 21:54, Eric Walker wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> This effect is not very significant in chaotic plasmas, such as in a >> Farnworth fusor device since there is too much field cancellation due to >> random motion. It can be very large for plasma arc filaments, though. >> >> >> >> Is this a confirmed effect, or one that has been hypothesized? >> >> >> >> I'm reminded of my drawing of what I think might be going on in LENR, >> where such an effect might be relevant: >> >> >> >> http://i.imgur.com/PoRGR7G.png >> >> >> >> (Also relevant in this model would be the accumulation of charge at the >> left hand side, due to the blocking of the protons once they get to the >> recess in the surface of the metal grain.) >> >> >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
