I agree with that summary On Wednesday, February 19, 2014, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
> The pillars of theoretical physics - quantum mechanics and general > relativity - are in a stand-off. One of them will have to blink if this > information paradox is to be undone. > > > http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22129552.400-fiery-black-hole-debate-creates-cosmological-wild-west.html#.UwUeKM6Ybm5 > > One of the assumptions of relativity is that the speed of light is > constant in a vacuum, but it may not always be so. Radioactive decay was > suppose to be constant but it is not. As the vacuum changes radioactive > decay changes with it directly along with the production of virtual > particles. LENR can accelerate radioactive decay millions of time over. > > LENR will show how to tweak the vacuum at and beyond its breaking point > just like astrophysical black holes do. But LENR will use nano EMF black > holes which will open a window into a new universe of physical laws. > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:06 PM, John Berry <[email protected]>wrote: > > Axil, I had not heard of loop quantum gravity before, I appreciate an > introduction to the theory. > > But it also gave me a good laugh that something called loop quantum > gravity has no concept for how gravity could work. > > John > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics) > > Spin is a usually misunderstood quantum mechanical property of particles. > It seems to me to be the most basic and primary property from which other > "emergent" properties come from. > > The vacuum is a fundamental manifestation of spin where all the particles > like the electron, photon , quarks, and so on emerge as secondary to spin. > > Spin is important in LENR because it is basic to quantum mechanics and the > vacuum. I like loop quantum gravity because it embraces matter as a tangle > and condensation of the vacuum. > > > Loop quantum gravity > Although it hasn't had the same media exposure, loop quantum gravity is so > far the only real rival to string theory. > > The basic idea is that space is not continuous, as we usually think, but > is instead broken up into tiny chunks 10^-35 metres across. These are then > connected by links to make the space we experience and spin can support > these links. When these links are tangled up into braids and knots, they > produce elementary particles and spin is basic to every particle. > Loop quantum gravity has produced some tentative predictions of real-world > effects, and has also shed some light on the birth of the universe. But its > proponents have so far struggled to incorporate gravity into their > theories. And as with string theory, a true experimental test is still some > way off. > > One basic scientific fallout of LENR is that its will provide these > experimental tests and that its most basic principles will help codify the > theory of everything. > > > http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18612-knowing-the-mind-of-god-seven-theories-of-everything.html#.UwSqfs6YbyQ > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:44 AM, John Berry <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > A magnetic field is produced by the spin of a particle and movement of > spin is not required. > > > I am reluctant to give spin much consideration, the definition of what it > is seems to change. > One thing I read stated that IIRC, the spin of a particle was wherever it > was looked for, uh huh. > > Ok, so does spin suggest there is no motion? > Hardly, spin is the definition of motion. > > So let us look at an electron floating in space, so does it produce a > magnetic field when you are not moving relative to it? > > Not that I have every heard. > > Ok, but I have heard of the magnetic moment of an electron... > > Looking it up it seems to say there is, if so then we should find > electrons to be attracted to magnetic fie > >
