On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:51 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
There have been a few occasions where it was clear you hadn't read my prior > messages, since you repeated what I had already said but without > attribution, > One doesn't need to attribute something to someone if it's a commonly held view and not particularly original. None of the points that I have made in this thread have been particularly original or deep or something to merit the whole apparatus of formal attribution. But it is true that I have not been reading through entire threads before replying to individual posts. I will try to do this more. > but this is the first time you didn't read what I said and imputed that I > said the opposite. > My apologies for the misattribution. Eric
