Imagine this. What if the magnetic component of the electromagnetic field was ignored. We would VanderGraphs, Winhurst motors, and fur rupped rods emitting jumping sparks. We would not have employed the very strong magnetic force. No generators, motors, electromagnets, or speakers would exist. The electrified world of today would not be. Electricity would only be a curiosity.
A coil with twice the turns has 4 times the magnetic effect. Where does the extra magnetic field come from? It comes from nowhere. The magnetic field is not conserved. It comes and goes as need to conserve momentum of the system when the original static field cannot. This strength of the non-conserved magnetic field made modem life possible. This is so well known that it is not even mentioned. The range of the electrical magnetic field can exceed that of the Coulombic. Superconductors entirely confine the Coulombic field yet a magnetic field extends beyond the bounds of the superconductor. All of the force fields conserve momentum in the same with, with an induced magnetic field. All of the magnetic components are not conserved. It is theoretically possible to dramatically increase them. All of them. No one to date has known how to increase the magnetic component of the strong nuclear force. This magnetic component is NOT electromagnetic. Cold fusion has shown the way. Vibrate a proton conductor at a dimensional frequency of one megahertz-meter. The non-conserved spin orbit force increases dramatically. Amazingly the process has gravitomagnetic effects too. We are on the verge of harnessing all of the natural forces. Why is it taking so long? Frank Z -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cook <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 1:52 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier Frank-- You noted: >>>The magnetic component of the strong nuclear force is called the spin orbit >>>force. It is never considered by the hot fusion people.<<< Why is it ignored? Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier Thats a common mistake. We cannot reduce the Coulomb barrier. The static force fields are conserved and cannot be reduced in a two body problem. The static force field can, however, be bypassed by a force with longer range. The magnetic component of the strong nuclear force is called the spin orbit force. It is never considered by the hot fusion people. In the solid cold fusion environment the magnetic component can be increased by a factor to 10 to the 39 power. Again I am not speaking of the electromagnetic field, I am speaking of the magnetic component of the strong nuclear force. In short "The constants of the motion tend toward the electromagnetic in a Bose condensate that is vibrated at a dimensional frequency of 1.094 megahertz-meters." Frank Z The Coulomb repulsion can be reduced by magnetic attraction according to my thoughts and that would also explain magnetic interactions and low temperature operation of LENR devices. Should we drop the reference to Coulomb barrier and replace it with reference to an Electromagnetic Barrier? Dave -----Original Message----- From: David Roberson <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 11:39 am Subject: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier We hear so much chatter about the Coulomb barrier and how difficult it is to overcome for fusion events to occur. Perhaps we should consider it as an electromagnetic barrier instead. There is plenty of reason to suspect that a magnetic component of force is active along with the electric component. Some in this list believe that spin coupling has a large impact upon the rate of LENR activity and there may well be other magnetic interactions associated with nano particles and their large local magnetic fields. I tend to think that these couplings are a key concept that needs to be understood in detail if an ultimate theory is to be developed. The Coulomb repulsion can be reduced by magnetic attraction according to my thoughts and that would also explain magnetic interactions and low temperature operation of LENR devices. Should we drop the reference to Coulomb barrier and replace it with reference to an Electromagnetic Barrier? Dave
