When the understanding and credibility of LENR is well entrenched is main stream science, the Mizuno (Yoshino) experiment and others like it will be a first of the primary and indispensable tools used to explore and quantify dark energy and its place in the universe.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > The "vacuum" according to experts, including Dirac, is not empty. If the > vacuum reacts with any kind of matter, it reacts with hydrogen. > > The prior post was based on the proton mass of 938.27231 MeV or 1876.545 > for > two protons, and the mass of the deuteron being 1875.613 MeV. > > Thus splitting deuterium, with subsequent neutron decay (even when > instantaneous and with no neutrino emission) cannot be net exothermic > without "something else", since the difference is -0.932 MeV. > > Curiously the mass-energy of electron/positron annihilation is 1.022 MeV. > > This ties into Dirac and Hotson's epo field interpretation. The epo field, > now called the BEC, is the superset of ZPE. Dirac's sea of negative energy > is also approximately the same background entity as the zero point field, > or > simply the "vacuum". > > If you merge Puthoff and Hotson, (two of Terry's favorites) then deuterium > "fission" into protons will be net energetic if virtual Ps enters into the > reaction. In fact the energy release will be strong for chemical or weak > for > nuclear, matching experimental finding - and in the zone of > non-detectability by gamma detectors, since the reactor walls will absorb > this level, but not much higher. > > D + Ps -> 2H + 90 keV ... which is about 100,000 times more energy release > than burning hydrogen. ( Ps is positronium). The next problem is > conservation of charge... which means you must annihilate the electron from > neutron decay with a positron from the epo field. > > Falsifiability - look for radiation inside the reactor at the approximate > level of 90 or 45 keV. > _____________________________________________ > > Yes - even if plausible way exists in QM for converting > deuterium to hydrogen with gain, that gain obviously does not derive from > the mass of the deuterium, per se. > > This leaves these main possibilities, and a few others > > 1) vacuum energy (ZPE) > 2) nickel mass via spin coupling > 3) Mills version of redundant ground states > > It could be possible that all of these are entwined. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton > > Axil wrote: They say that the data never lies; but wow, > does > LENR really get all or most of its energy from the vacuum? > > > I have always thought so. But, then, I have been a > Puthoff fan-boy for ages. :-) >
