The Surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) is a hybrid infrared/electron combo wave. It has spin and most important ...IT IS A BOSON.. BOSON means unlimited strength. That wave based spin produces the anapole magnetic field when the SPP forms a soliton in a vortex.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil-- > > You finally have seen the light--the EMF that is. > > I joined this Blog a little over 2 months ago with a bias that spin and > magnetism are the keys to LENR. I have been exposed to a lot of ideas and > some facts. I am even more biased now. > > Spin is an energy with a direction and can be controlled by a magnetic > field. The magnetic field establishes the amount of energy (via spin) a > particle can hold and the differential amounts it can give up or take up. > The old timers thought the energy was akin to a spinning top's energy and > angular momentum. I am beginning to think of it as a mini Vortex of a > magnetic field more or less locally confined within a volume of space--the > particle boundary. > > Clarifying what is happening is just a matter of thinking inside the > boundary. > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:05 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention > > Based on the time honored LENR causation concept of charge screening, LENR > is posited to be an EMF process. Since charge is emergent from spin, and > spin is the origin on magnetism. therefore. LENR is a magnetic based > process at its root. > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> Ahern seems to believe magnetic effects are at the heart of LENR >>> phenomena. >>> >> >> Each experimentalist and theorist has a pet theory about what is going >> on. What is important is whether one is able to subjugate one's personal >> hunches to a more objective and systematic pursuit of what is going on. >> >> >>> He does not think nuclear reactions are involved. >>> >> >> This should be a warning sign that Dr. Ahern might not be seeing much of >> interest. What seems clear is that some researchers get very pronounced >> results. >> >> Eric >> >> >
