Recombination shoud read Recrimination.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > DGT was producing steam, not 212 water. The change of state energy from > water to steam was not reflected in the COP calculations. Yes this is > inaccurate, but gross under estimate of the COP. I am depending on memory, > correct me if I have erred. > > Jed, you are whipping yourselfer into a frenzy of recombination. Such > a negative position will damage your reputation if DGT does have something > that you say they don't. A charge of bad judgment might be leveled upon DGT > success. > > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I judge the MIT conference that DGT pulled out of as a sign of disgust >>> with the powers that be in the LENR field and the first step at going dark >>> to them for DGT. >>> >> >> They pulled out because they knew this scandal would soon break. They >> knew the jig was up. >> >> I knew it too. I have heard from NI and many others that the flow rate >> was bogus. I did not know it was as bad as this! I assumed it was a mistake. >> >> There is world of difference between an honest mistake and a company that >> does not allow its own joint venture to take elementary precautions to >> confirm the measurements. We all make stupid mistakes from time to time. >> But when a company goes out of its way to prevent a proper test, that >> stinks. It is tantamount to fraud, even if fraud is not intended. >> "Tantamount" meaning it might as well be fraud, for all intents and >> purposes. If I were on the jury I would hardly see the need to make the >> distinction or prove intent. >> >> I cannot imagine why Axil is defending these people, when their own >> president has clearly stated the flow calorimetry was wrong. He knew that >> the day after the ICCF18 demo. He has been covering up ever since. What >> more proof of dishonesty and bad faith can you ask for? >> >> - Jed >> >> >
