Well, the professor should be questioned, if not chided - about what is not seen and not reported, instead of what is seen and glossed over. This is substandard, at best.
It is an interesting experiment BUT it is one that looks more like the Rossi effect than Mills. Heat is added to trigger thermal gain in experiment in which a ferromagnetic material is used - and the added gain is seen. That fits Rossi whereas the hallmark of Mills experiments is UV emission. No mention of UV. The most reasonable conclusion for UV not being mentioned is that Mills knew ahead of time, when he provided the experimental details, that UV was absent. There is no indication that this relates to “hydrinos”… From: Carl High Leaving aside for the moment that he was working with the controversial Randall Mills, a professor from University of Illinois has affixed his good name to evidence that non-chemistry-based heat is produced when a copper hydroxide/copper bromide mixture is heated to 300C in a differential scanning calorimeter. http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/GlumacReportwithGraphics2014.pdf Acknowledging that I am not an expert in technology such as this, this evidence does appear as credit-worthy as any of the material I saw presented at the recent MIT colloquium. A well-documented fairly straight-forward replication of an experiment showing an anomalous heat signature. As such his work deserves to be added to the diverse gallery of anomalies that we so avidly track and discuss, and is ultimately deserving of an explanation why and how. An added benefit:if you google the image of Nick Glumac you will quickly notice that he is not a septuagenarian shuffling around a lab long after he has earned his pension. So let's give him credit for being a young man who is willing to put his career in jeopardy by demonstrating and affirming an effect that most of his peers would deride as junk science. May there be many more like him. Steve High
