Deception can be a terribel factor...
We all know many ex-smokers more fanatic against than many non-smokers.

It raise also something that I painfully realized, that cold fusion only
"looks" simple, but is awfully complex to harness...
not so differently from many technology however, like semiconductors, steam
engine, planes, superconductors...
after a scientific breakthrough we all start to dream of how we will make
cars fly, and then we realise that it explode  not even with a good sound...


2014-06-24 13:51 GMT+02:00 Peter Gluck <[email protected]>:

> I have met Douglas Morrison at ICCF-2 Como; actually my very short paper
> aabout cold fusion statistics see :
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/03/my-cold-fusion-history-i.html
>
> was prepared to  show him that he does not understand statistics of cold
> fusion experiments. He was actually a believer turned skeptic very
> disappointed by the slow progress in the field. He was initially convinced
> that cold fusion will progress fast toward applications but has lost his
> enthusiasm
> because this does not happened. He was not alone with this defeatist
> attitude.
> I also met at Como Prof Heinz Gerischer who had great expectations from
> CF- in 1991.
>
> Cold Fusion is real, however strange.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all and especially the historians.
>>
>> I have recently been challenged about my vision of Morisson personality,
>> which I interpret under the vision of Charles Beaudette and the Titanic
>> paper of Jed
>>
>> http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusion.pdf#page=4
>>
>> is there a more positive interpretation of his personality, his history ?
>>
>> It is said Morrison was a great enthusiast at the beginning, but turned
>> anti-lenr (because of evidence say the skeptic)... is it right, is there
>> documents?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>

Reply via email to