And what exactly makes "science" more trustworthy. Is it because it is repeatable? or is it because we can feel it with our senses? or simply because it is presumed to be the opposite of religion? It seems that science now a days means anything that is anti-relgion.
To me science is simply the "search for the truth". Whatever the search leads to should be considered. Science should not exclude a whole class of explanations because it is not repeatable or can not be experienced with our five senses. There are many concepts today that pretend to be science which are not repeatable, can not be observed and measured. Yet, they are science. I am assuming I do not need to elaborate about Charlie's theory. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel Rocha To: John Milstone Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12:08 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Accuracy of Carbon Dating Thank you for your education. It's quite more reasonable to suppose that the Nephilim are aliens than legends. After after all, random words in the Bible are more trustful than science. 2014-08-25 13:00 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>: But since you appear to be ignorant on this subject, let me see if I can educate you. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
