[http://www.byzipp.com/gamma.png]
Sorry in advance, this is a work in progress initiated by a desire to offer a more succinct argument regarding the relativistic theory of Casimir effect. The gist of the concept is that mainstream has convinced the world of how difficult it is to reach relativistic effects based on the formula above where v^2 must be a significant portion of C^2. I have followed Puthoff’s, Haisch and Rhueda’s papers regarding virtual particles acting like raindrops thru our 3d plane where a speeding car is used as an analogy to near C spacecraft where instead of accumulating vacuum pressure the car accumulates raindrops as it accelerates thru the storm. I totally agree that this is an energy intensive method to access relativistic effects but disagree that physics can therefore discount this possibility in lattice defects or geometries that initiate large Casimir, Hall or London type forces. In fact I am positing that the above formula with a quality coefficient proportional to ideal metals could be related directly to the Casimir formula in the same way 2piFL was related to 1/2piFC to derive resonant formula for electronics or solve for any of the other variables you choose to algebraically isolate. I think that the breach in isotropy of Casimir effect demonstrates a negative energy where instead of increasing the intersection rate of windshield to the ambient “raindrops” we instead make the Casimir cavity into an umbrella where the ambient is reduced - no energy is required utilizing instead a quantum property of the conductive metals and geometry. The breaches in isotropy even relative to each other occur at the inverse cube of distance between geometries forming a tapestry of wild fluctuations [as seen by the random motion of gas particles between them] in the geometrical sweet spot where these quantum forces can focus between 2-12nm. The closer together the regions, the higher the force and the more rapidly the changes in focal points such that even the smallest deviations from parallel boundaries produce large variations in vacuum pressure for the randomly moving gas atoms between. These forces are felt between nano powders or skeletal catalysts that form mirrors/boundaries/plates and effect any gas atoms migrating between them. The hydrogen atoms migrating thru these regions feel equivalent negative acceleration in the same way we feel gravity but pushing them away from our 3d plane instead of attracting us to it they seem to contract symmetrically from our perspective instead of only in the direction of near C velocity we are familiar with for the Paradox spacecraft. I made the previous statement to underline that the hydrogen gas migrating thru this region is in a negatively modified region where it perceives the outside world equivalently accelerating away from it. I am convinced that condensed form of hydrogen are actually relativistically contracted in the same manner as an observer standing at the bottom a deep gravity well experiencing equivalent acceleration at some fraction of C without spatial motion still seem shrunken and time dilated to us outside his gravity well even without spatial motion. We are used to the stationary perspective but the paradox spacecraft would see the universe around it to seemingly expand symmetrically time units becoming larger while spatial units get smaller. The Casimir effect [umbrella] is just the opposite where space units get larger - possibly allowing relativistic displacement to keep the Casimir Lipschitz limit beyond the 2-12nm limit from our perspective while still maintaining it from the perspective of the dimensionally displaced hydrogen trapped between. Oh and yes I believe time units get smaller accounting for anomalous decay rates of radioactive gases but by a method of segregation where equal and opposite regions form tributaries that concentrate the umbrella effect in the cavity while the surrounding outer regions are slightly increased like the rain running off an umbrella would as a necessary component since we cant get something for nothing and it is only the random motion of gas and their natural affinity to seek openings of a certain scale that we are exploiting – perhaps the claims of reduced decay rates and cold anomalies are related to gases that have an affinity for staying outside the umbrella under the “runoff” regions. Fran
