I’m sorry but that is not what Miles seems to be saying now. You are putting 
words in his mouth. In any event, the rate measured is incredibly low – well 
below any confidence level and well below atmospheric levels - so it is of 
negligible value. It is milliwatt level, in a world begging for kilowatts.

 

IMO - the only result that matters to most of Science, going forward, will be 
the result of experiments of greater than 10 watts, and hopefully 100 watts or 
more. 

 

AFAIK – Mizuno is the only player in this game in 2014, insofar as the putative 
fusion of deuterium at the 100 watt level is concerned. His results on this 
issue of helium, or lack thereof, will stand out as of highest importance - 
since it could well be the case that QM allows a small level of fusion at 
extremely low levels but with a reverse economy of scale that prevents it above 
the watt level.

 

 

From: Jed Rothwell 

 

Jones Beene wrote:

 

For the collection flasks he could have used anything. It was too late.

Helium diffuses into the electrolysis cell itself during the operation.

 

Yes, some does come in. This amount can be measured in a null experiment. It is 
the background amount. As it happens, Miles had many null experiments with no 
heat.

 

 

Diffusion is based on amu. Argon is 10 times heaver than helium and it
diffuses much more slowly through a material - when both can be diffused.
However, argon does not diffuse into Pyrex at all and helium does.

 

As I said, he looked for other gasses as well, and he looked for the overall 
amount of helium, which is to say the amount that diffuses in when you do 
nothing (let the cell sit there), or when you conduct electrolysis but there is 
no excess heat. When there is no excess heat the amount that diffuses in is 
always much less than what is measured after there is excess heat. In other 
words excess heat produces significantly more than the background from 
diffusion, but much less than the atmospheric background.

 

Other objections have been raised and met. For example, some people said that 
perhaps the excess heat changed conditions and allowed more helium to defuse 
in. As Miles pointed out, and as I repeated in my report, this cannot be the 
case because in some tests with no excess heat the overall input power was 
greater than the positive tests, and the cell was hotter.

 

- Jed

 

Reply via email to